5 Types of Consent: Part 5 — Personal Relationship

CASL

Mar 18, 2019

Canada’s new anti-spam law (CASL) was passed in December 2010 and, following a Governor in Council order, it entered into force on July 1, 2014. The law helps to protect Canadians while ensuring that businesses can continue to compete in the global marketplace. Parts 1-4 explored express consent and implied consent involving existing business, non-business relationships, and conspicuously published addresses. Here in Part 5: personal relationships.

A “personal relationship” requires that the real identity of the individual who alleges a personal relationship is known by the other individual involved in such a relationship (as opposed to instances where a virtual identity or an alias is used). Using social media or sharing the same network does not necessarily reveal a personal relationship between individuals. The mere use of buttons available on social media websites — such as clicking “like,” voting for or against a link or post, accepting someone as a “Friend,” or clicking “Follow” — will generally be insufficient to constitute a personal relationship.

Section 6 of CASL does not apply to a commercial electronic message (CEM) sent to an individual with whom the sender has a personal or family relationship, as defined the Governor-in-Council (GiC) Regulations.

A “personal relationship” involves direct, voluntary, 2-way communication. The GiC Regulations set out a non-exhaustive list of factors that should be used to determine whether the relationship is personal (e.g. the sharing of interests, experiences, opinions and information evidenced in the communications; the frequency of the communication, and so on). It is important to note that the definition of personal relationship should remain limited to close relationships. This will help prevent potential spammers from exploiting this concept in order to send CEMs without consent.

Also, a “personal relationship” is one that exists between individuals. Legal entities, such as corporations, cannot have a personal relationship. Someone who sends a CEM on behalf of a corporation may not claim to have a personal relationship with the recipient.

Photo credit: Duy Pham on Unsplash

Related Articles


Changing Scene

  • Bartle & Gibson and Eaton Announce New Partnership

    Bartle & Gibson and Eaton Announce New Partnership

    Bartle & Gibson Co. Ltd. and Eaton Industries (Canada) Company have recently announced a new regional partnership that expands access to Eaton’s electrical solutions across Western Canada. This agreement enables customers throughout the Western provinces to procure a broad range of Eaton products, including Electrical Power Distribution and Control Solutions, Bussmann series, B-Line series, Crouse-Hinds, and… Read More…

  • Mike Smith Honoured with the 2026 EFC Award of Excellence

    Mike Smith Honoured with the 2026 EFC Award of Excellence

    On March 25, 2026, Electro-Federation Canada (EFC) proudly presented the Award of Excellence to Mike Smith, formerly of Rockwell Automation, in recognition of his exceptional contributions to the electrical industry. The EFC Award of Excellence is a peer-recognized distinction that honours individuals who have demonstrated outstanding leadership and impact in the areas of codes and… Read More…


Peers & Profiles